Saifilter Porous Metal Design Guidebook

Introduction and Definitions

This exposition delves into the realm of porous sintered metals, originating from metallic dust, elucidating their fabrication processes and encompassing details on design specifics and practical aspects. 

Porous metallic substances are crafted with deliberately designed, interlinked voids, conceived through powder metallurgy techniques. To navigate the industry’s lexicon and pertinent standards, consider these terminologies:

  • Pores: The vacant expanses within the metallic framework.
  • Interconnected Porosity: These voids are woven together, extending to the component’s surfaces, facilitating the transit of fluids across. In contrast, solitary pores lack this dual-surface connectivity, impeding fluid movement.
  • Percent Porosity: This metric approximates the vacant volume, calculated as 100% less the density of the part. It typically encompasses the aggregate voids of both interconnected and isolated porosity. The morphology, dimensions, and distribution of these pores are pivotal in characterizing the available open space.
  • Particle Retention Rating: This denotes the dimension of particles that are filtered out from a fluid. To ensure comparability of particle retention ratings across filters, the testing methodology and filtration efficacy must be explicitly stated.
  • Micron Grade or Micron Rating: This is a relative measure, indicating the dimension of a rigid, spherical particle that is halted by the porous structure. It is often derived from the pressure needed to induce air to percolate through the largest pore when the part is submerged in a testing liquid. This value, commonly known as the “Bubble Point,” is intricately influenced by the shape of the pores.
  • Permeability: This refers to the velocity of fluid passage through a specified area of the porous material under a set pressure difference.

Applications & Design Advantages  

The quintessential utilizations of porous sintered metals encompass:

Apparatuses for Dichotomizing Solids from Liquids and Vapors

namely, apparatuses for catalyst confinement, fuel oil combustion enhancers, polymer manipulation, instrument protection, pressure modulation, cryogenic fluid handling, and medicinal aerosol dispensing systems.

Mechanisms for Gauging Fluid Movement and Regulating Pressure

including flow constrictors, precision leaks, aeration vents, pneumatic temporizers, chronometric devices, gauge dampeners, and pressure homogenization tools.

Repositories for Liquid Retention

such as self-anointing bearings, capillary action threads, thermal regulation devices, and heat transfer components.

Deterrents for Flames and Electrical Discharges in Flammable Gas Management

encompassing welding/cutting torch flame barriers, and electrical compartment safeguards.

Acoustic Moderation and Reduction:

comprising pneumatic sound suppressors and microphone dampeners.

Gas Dispersion and Aeration

including fluidized bed interfaces, air cushioning systems, vacuum panels, spargers for carbonation processes, oxygen extraction, and ozone infusion.

Containment for Media Elements

such as porous barricades for moisture-absorbing agents, scavengers, and purifiers.

Pivotal attributes of porous P/M components encompass:


  • Robust tensile fortitude, resistance to corrosion, and enduringness, are inherent in each foundational metal powder.
  • Deliberately crafted porosity for bespoke filtration characteristics.
  • Tailored permeability to conform to specific flow criteria.
  • Expansive scope in design, enabling filtration of particulates ranging from 0.1 to 200 Flow rates extend from minuscule seepages to substantial volumes.
  • Sturdiness, resilience to jolts, and simplicity in purification.


  • Crafted from universally procurable metal powders.
  • Distributed by seasoned P/M fabricators globally.
  • Produced in an array of configurations and magnitudes.


  • Mass production methodologies are firmly established.
  • Components are typically apt for automated amalgamation.
  • Precise dimensional regulation is achieved as a standard.
  • P/M’s intrinsic design of net-shape curtails the necessity for extensive machining and reduces material wastage.

Extensive Assortment of Porous Metal Substances:

Predominant P/M porous materials encompass:

  • Stainless Steel (Type 316L SS)
  • Bronze (Copper-10%Tin)
  • Nickel 200
  • Nickel-Based Alloys (Monel™, Inconel™, Haynes™)
  • ™ registered trademark of Inco, Ltd.
  • Titanium, Copper, Aluminum, and precious metals

Industry Benchmarks for Pore Size, Density, and Permeability:

  • Mean and Maximum Pore Size- ISO 4003
  • Bubble Point Pore Size- ASTM E128-61
  • Density- measurement in dry or wet state – ISO 2738
  • Permeability- ISO 4022

Manufacturing Methods

In the realm of crafting porous sintered metal artifacts, the methodology hinges on the dimensions and configuration of the component, the chosen material, and the requisite degree of porosity. These artifacts are predominantly shaped through a handful of distinct techniques:

Axial Compaction and Sintering:


In this process, metal dust is subjected to formidable pressure within a mold, ensuring that the dust granules coalesce at their junctures. This fusion imparts sufficient robustness for the nascent part to withstand handling post-extraction from the mold. 

The initial (pre-sintered) durability of the component is contingent upon various attributes of the metal dust – its composition, granule dimensions, form, and purity – as well as the applied pressure during formation. Porous metal components diverge from conventional Powder Metallurgy (P/M) structural elements in that they necessitate compression at diminished pressures and may require meticulously calibrated powder mesh sizes to fulfill specific porosity criteria.

 After their formation, these initial parts undergo a heating process, or sintering, in a regulated environment. This is executed at temperatures below the metal’s melting point but sufficiently high to fuse the particles, thereby significantly enhancing the component’s strength.

Materials such as Stainless Steel, Titanium, Nickel, Nickel Alloys, and select Bronze variants are typically processed via this technique. Its merits include elevated production velocities, precise control over permeability, and exceptional consistency in dimensions.

Gravity Sintering:

In the realm of metallurgical engineering, the technique known as Gravity Sintering, or more poetically, the “loose powder” method, stands out for its ability to craft porous metallic components. This method is particularly adept with materials like bronze, which exhibit a propensity for diffusion bonding. The essence of this process lies in its gentle approach: no external force is exerted to mold the piece. 

Instead, the selected material, meticulously sorted by particle size, is delicately cascaded into a mold’s cavity, mirroring the desired silhouette of the final object. Upon reaching the pivotal sintering temperature, a transformative metallurgical fusion occurs, creating intricate bonding junctures at the particles’ meeting points.

When delving into the intricacies of gravity sintering, a design engineer must envisage the final form as being enshrouded within a mold. This mold is unique, featuring an aperture at its zenith for the introduction of the powder. The envisioned shape should be such that it can be effortlessly liberated from its mold post-sintering. A standard inclination of 10 degrees along the part’s sides usually suffices for this emancipation, although this axiom fluctuates with the depth of the fill and the material’s caliber.

The latitude in part tolerances is a subject of paramount importance. Internal dimensions tend to be more consistent, as materials often contract towards the core during sintering. However, external dimensions can exhibit variability, influenced by factors such as size, form, and the density of the fill. Thus, a design tolerance guideline of ± two percent is recommended for gravity sintering. Notwithstanding, should the need arise, more stringent tolerances can be achieved through subsequent sizing operations.

The overall length of the part should be specified with a degree of generosity, primarily to circumvent the need for additional processing. A general guideline would be a leeway of three percent, though this may vary depending on the material grade or the part’s geometry.

Powder Rolling and Sintering:


In the realm of metallurgical engineering, the technique of Powder Rolling and Sintering stands as a pivotal process. This method is instrumental in crafting porous P/M sheets from an array of materials including stainless steel, copper, bronze, nickel-based alloys, and titanium.

The genesis of these sheets involves either direct powder rolling or the gravitational deposition of powders into molds, followed by calendaring, before the sintering phase. The deliberate selection of powder granule dimensions is crucial in attaining the desired porosity.

The physical attributes of the P/M sheets, such as density and material composition, dictate their availability in a spectrum of thicknesses, ranging from a slender 0.25 mm to a more robust 3 mm.

These sheets also boast expansive area dimensions, extending up to a square meter or encompassing several square feet. Versatility in their application is evident, as these sheets can undergo processes like shearing, rolling, and welding, morphing into diverse structural forms.

Isostatic Compaction and Sintering:

Isostatic Compaction, a method wherein uniform pressure is meticulously applied to a pliable encasement-cradling metal powder destined for densification, shines in fabricating components with a pronounced length-to-diameter proportion. This system typically encompasses a pressure chamber engineered to confine a fluid under formidable pressure, a malleable encasement, and arbors or cores for the creation of tubular or uniquely shaped artifacts. 

Through judicious selection of pressurizing liquids and encasements, the Isostatic technique can be adapted for high-temperature applications, known as Hot Isostatic Pressing, although the majority of porous components are crafted at ambient temperatures. The nascent part, once extricated from the Isostatic apparatus, undergoes standard sintering. This methodology is compatible with all traditional Powder Metallurgy (P/M) substances.

Metal Spraying:

In the realm of metallurgy, one can fabricate a permeable metallic edifice through the application of metal spraying. This technique involves the projection of liquefied metal onto a substrate, with the porosity meticulously modulated by the spraying parameters or through the simultaneous dispersion of an ancillary substance. 

This secondary material, introduced during the spraying process, can subsequently be extracted to refine the structure’s porosity.

Metal Coating and Sintering:

In the realm of 6. Metal Coating and Sintering, an amalgamation of metallic particulates is amalgamated with specialized adhesives to concoct a slurry. This concoction is then adeptly applied to permeable foundations or employed in the crafting of components with precise geometries.

Exacting attention and specialized apparatus are imperative to ensure the meticulous extraction of the adhesive and to achieve a homogenous distribution of voids.

Alchemy of Metal Injection Molding and Sintering:

In the realm of Metal Injection Molding (MIM), one can craft porous substances by amalgamating metallic dust with copious quantities of meticulously engineered adhesives, thus yielding a malleable compound suitable for high-pressure impregnation. Contingent upon the intrinsic properties of the material and the bespoke design of the MIM apparatus, it is feasible to sculpt distinct entities with meticulously regulated density.

Owing to the substantial contraction encountered during the expurgation of the binder, specialized apparatus for both debinding and sintering are indispensable in the transmutation of materials via this technique.

Materials and Properties

1. Stainless Stee– Type 316L (UNS 31603)

Intrinsic Composition: 18% Chromium, 13% Nickel, 2% Molybdenum, 1% Silicon, a maximum of 0.03% Carbon.

In the realm of manufacturing, porous components are often crafted from stainless steel, primarily for its unparalleled resistance to thermal stress and corrosive degradation. Among the austenitic classifications (300 Series) of stainless steel, various grades are technically feasible for production. 

Yet, from a commercial perspective, Type 316L stands alone in its availability across a diverse spectrum of particle dimensions, essential for fabricating porous Powder Metallurgy (P/M) components that meet diverse specifications.

Furthermore, Type 316L powder, enriched with a higher quotient of nickel and molybdenum, exhibits enhanced resistance to corrosion compared to the conventional Type 302/303 stainless variants.

Components fashioned from Type 316L stainless steel retain their resistance to oxidation and maintain strength at high temperatures, akin to fully annealed Type 316L stainless. However, their corrosion resistance is marginally inferior to wrought stainless, attributable to the extensive surface area and the relatively diminutive interparticle adhesion.

2. Bronze- Quintessential Composition: 89% Copper, 10% Tin, 1% Phosphorous.

A salient benefit of porous P/M bronze, when juxtaposed with other porous sintered metals, is its economic advantage. Predominantly, the fabrication of porous bronze components involves the gravitational sintering of spherical or cylindrical granules, which culminates in reduced production expenditures. 

Nonetheless, it’s noteworthy that the mechanical attributes of porous bronze elements generally do not reach the same zenith as those of other porous metallic substances that necessitate compaction antecedent to sintering.

3. Nickel and Nickel-Based Alloys

In scenarios where the requisites surpass the capabilities of stainless steel, particularly in resisting corrosion or enduring high temperatures, alloys based on nickel emerge as a superior choice. 

These alloys, including standard Monel™, Inconel™, and various Hastelloys™, are often procurable in filter-grade powders. It’s prudent for designers to engage in dialogue with their P/M suppliers at the inception of their project. Such early consultations could lead to an alternative material choice, potentially averting the need for a bespoke powder acquisition and thus, facilitating notable fiscal efficiencies.

  • In environments of acidic aqua, where stainless steel succumbs to crevice corrosion, the utilization of Monel™ or Hastelloy™ is advisable.
  • For contexts demanding resilience to both elevated temperatures and aggressive corrosive conditions, Inconel™ and Hastelloys™ are the materials of choice.
  • Beyond its role in the realm of battery and fuel cell plates, nickel carves a niche in the domain of submicron particle filtration, particularly for the purification of high-grade gases.

4. Titanium

Titanium, in its porous form, exhibits remarkable corrosion resistance, rendering it exceptionally suitable for filtration tasks in severe conditions. This variant of Titanium is procurable in an array of forms including sheets, tubes, and bespoke components, featuring meticulously regulated porosity that spans from a 100 Micron Grade to an ultra-fine 0.5 Micron Grade. 

The production of Porous Titanium incurs a higher expense compared to other porous substances, attributed to the necessity for either vacuum or argon sintering methodologies. During the sintering phase, Titanium’s structure becomes susceptible to embrittlement when even minuscule quantities of oxygen or hydrogen are present, necessitating the use of specialized furnaces to preclude any contact with air or moisture.

 For applications that demand the utmost purity, such as in the medical, chemical, or aerospace sectors, commercially pure Titanium (with a minimum purity of 99.5%), specifically Grade 2 or of a higher echelon of purity, is the preferred choice.  

Designing and Specifying Porous Sintered Metals 

Attributes of Efficacy in Design

In the realm of crafting P/M porous metal components, it’s presupposed that the architect possesses an astute comprehension of the intended operational objective of the product, predominantly in realms involving some aspect of fluid manipulation. For the sake of distillation, these operational objectives are categorized into four distinct clusters:

  • Filtration – envisaged as a process of bifurcation (extricating a gas, liquid, or solid from another gas or liquid) executed with the minimal feasible pressure decrement.
  • Regulation of Flow – characterized as the initiation of a predetermined pressure decrement within a fluidic movement system.
  • Dispersion – identified as the capacity to ensure a homogenous distribution of fluid flow across an expansive zone, as exemplified in devices like a sparger, air cushion, or vacuum clamping plate.
  • Porosity – delineated as the network of open spaces interlaced within the metallic framework.



Porous sintered commodities serve as a medium for in-depth filtration, boasting a labyrinthine network of pore dimensions and passageway lengths, intricately influenced by the granular characteristics, form, and dimensions of particles. This depth filter surpasses a mere screen filter in its capacity to ensnare contaminants, yet it also incurs a more substantial pressure decrement compared to a screen with a similar porosity index.

These Porous P/M components excel in executing remarkably meticulous filtration processes. The discourse on absolute versus nominal filtration, or micron gradations, is a labyrinthine subject, too multifaceted for brief exposition here. Indeed, so convoluted is this topic that much of the filter design in P/M porous media for novel applications lean heavily on empirical performance evaluations (actual sample testing) rather than relying solely on theoretical design frameworks.

In the realm of filtration design, synergistic collaboration between the part architect and the P/M supplier is paramount. This is because the pressure decrement is contingent not just on the P/M structure but also on the operational area and thickness.

Frequently, an augmentation in the filtration expanse can be achieved through judicious selection of part geometry and dimensions. However, such decisions must be informed by a comprehensive understanding of their repercussions on the manufacturing of P/M parts.

Porous P/M filter components are characterized by their robustness and rigidity, standing resilient against mechanical damage, unlike delicate screens, not as brittle as ceramic filters, nor as malleable as organic felted substances.

Designers grappling with filtration challenges should employ a value analysis approach, scrutinizing all functional facets. In numerous scenarios, a potential equilibrium exists between the precision of separation and the allowable pressure decrements (refer to the accompanying chart). The plethora of shape options and the straightforward assembly of P/M parts can yield significant manufacturing cost efficiencies.

Flow Control  

In the realm of precision engineering, the artistry of regulating product fabrication in Powder Metallurgy (P/M) is a testament to technological finesse. This meticulous orchestration allows for the modulation of the component’s porosity, oscillating from a minimal 10% to an expansive 60%. Such mastery in porosity manipulation enables the artisan to fine-tune the gradation of pressure diminution in fluid dynamics with remarkable exactitude.

This technique finds its niche in the mass production of calibrated “leaks” for diverse applications, ranging from timing mechanisms to gas regulation modules, traditionally governed by fixed orifices or unyielding valves. P/M flow regulation components are now ubiquitously crafted in substantial volumes for pneumatic timers, automotive time delay constituents, and gas conduits for precision instruments.

Given the extensive applicability of these controlled porosity P/M elements, it is imperative to underscore these pivotal advisories: the stipulations must mirror the functional exigencies; the approval assays should be established through a collaborative dialogue between the client and the supplier.

The dimensional consistency and permeability of P/M parts suggest that their installation costs could undercut those of traditional materials like cotton or fabric. In acoustical applications, for instance, P/M facilitates automated assembly and often obviates the need for bespoke post-production treatments on individual items.

Specifications typically encompass low-pressure airflow characteristics or definitive acoustical resistance metrics. Porous metal components, treated to repel water, enable military electronics to maintain operational integrity while precluding water ingress during submersion. Analogous components are employed for pressure stabilization in airborne equipment, with specifications delineating minimal water retention and requisite airflow parameters.

In the arena of flow restriction, P/M components hold their own against traditional orifices and capillary tubes, both economically and qualitatively. The correlation between flow and pressure drop in these components is markedly more linear than in their orifice or capillary counterparts and can be fine-tuned by adjusting density, particle size, and structural design. A solitary contaminant, potent enough to clog an orifice or capillary, would scarcely impact a P/M component.

However, an accumulation of smaller impurities might incrementally escalate restriction. This issue can be mitigated in automotive applications by integrating a larger P/M component with finer pores upstream of the restrictor, serving as a pre-filter to extend the lifespan of the restrictor. P/M flow restrictors, akin to electrical resistors, are versatile in their utility across pneumatic, fluidic, or vacuum systems, mirroring the multifaceted roles of their electronic counterparts. 

Specifications for these components typically encompass a range of time delays under defined conditions or specified flow rates at certain pressure differentials.

P/M parts also excel as pneumatic silencers and pressure snubbers, adept at tempering fluctuations in pressurized liquid or gas systems. The characteristics of these components are gauged by their minimum airflow capacities at specific pressure drops.


Permeability delineates the degree of pressure decrement experienced during the traversal of a specified liquid through a designated expanse of the filter. Constructs shaped through gravitational sintering inherit a porosity/Permeability nexus, predominantly governed by the granule magnitude. 

Densely packed P/M porous components can be fabricated with a spectrum of porosity/Permeability ratios, contingent on the compactness attained during the compression phase. Fluctuations in Permeability, to the tune of 3:1 or even more, are attainable in components with analogous porosity levels. 

This manipulation of control permits the creation of elements for regulating flow. In instances where the component is not a filter, it is prudent for the designer to stipulate the required Permeability, entrusting the decision of porosity to the discretion of the fabricator.

In the realm of gas distribution apparatus design, particularly those crafted from Powdered Metal (P/M) components, the primary concern hinges on the delineation of functional parameters.

The conception of a sparger, tasked with the infusion of gas beneath a liquid’s surface, hinges on a myriad of factors: the confines of spatial availability, the liquid’s inherent properties such as thermal state and corrosive nature, the desired minuteness of the bubbles (typically petite), the volume of gas to be diffused, and the gas’s pressure. These criteria typically suffice for both the consumer and the fabricator to deduce an ideal amalgamation of material and geometric form.


In the case of a vacuum hold-down or its analog, an air bearing, the selection is often predicated on the historical knowledge of either the user or the manufacturer.

Porous metal P/M components find their application in the fabrication of air distribution manifolds, tasked with the dispersion of copious amounts of air across a designated expanse at a subdued velocity.

Here, the design mandates are performance-oriented: the dispersal of a specific volume of gas across a predetermined area, maintaining a certain pressure gradient. P/M parts are predominantly chosen for their superior robustness, resistance to corrosion and thermal degradation (in comparison to organic porous substances), or when their production proves more cost-effective than that of machined metal manifolds.

In the engineering of porous metal components, the value of empirical, hands-on experimentation is paramount. This approach, often more feasible and economical, is favored over theoretical analysis, which typically relies on insufficient data.

Pore Structure Complexity

The concept of pore structure complexity eludes a precise definition, as it encompasses not only a spectrum of orifice dimensions but also a labyrinth of channels varying in length and convolution. In assessing this complexity, the Powder Metallurgy (P/M) sector employs the “bubble point” examination, a method that ascertains the pressure at which a bubble emerges on the component’s surface when submerged in alcohol. 

This micron gauge is loosely indicative of the component’s capacity to intercept particles. A lower gauge signifies the utilization of finer powder in the component’s fabrication, resulting in an escalated pressure differential. In the realm of filter architecture, it is incumbent upon the client to delineate the maximal dimensions of permissible particles in the filtrate, enabling the P/M fabricator to strive for the minimal pressure differential at the specified micron gauge.

For comparative analysis of media, commercial apparatuses are available to ascertain pore size distribution, providing metrics for both average and maximal pore dimensions.

Mechanical Properties


The strength and moduli of a porous P/M part are related to the density and the properties of the fully annealed base metal. 



In the realm of component shape, it’s acknowledged that the ideal contour of an element is dictated not solely by the spatial constraints but equally by the chosen fabrication technique. Each method of creation carries its spectrum of benefits and drawbacks.

Parts shaped through gravity sintering encounter specific limitations – for instance, a requisite incline on elongated components, with a minimum of 1 percent gradient – yet they also boast certain merits, such as modest tooling expenditures, the capacity to forge conical shapes, tapering segments, and undercuts.

The process of compaction is particularly adept at crafting elements devoid of inclines, boasting high production rates and remarkable consistency in both attributes and measurements. Nonetheless, this method has its limitations, notably the impracticality of incorporating undercuts and the challenges in fabricating tapered or extended components.

Isostatic pressing, on the other hand, is capable of yielding elongated tubes or rods, conical configurations, and intricate geometries, though it’s important to note that the per-unit cost can be substantial.

Enumerating the constraints in design

Gravitational Sintering

Dimensional Scope – Ranging from minuscule components to sizes only bounded by the capacity of the kiln; diameters extending to six feet or more; porous panels up to 24” by 60”.


Dimensional Range – Spanning from less than .020” in diameter to a 12” diameter, the limit set by the press and kiln dimensions; the ideal length-to-diameter ratio hovers around 2.5:1.

Dimensional Precision – ± ½% in diameter and ±2% in thickness.

Isostatic Pressing/Sintering

Dimensional Extent – From 1/8” diameter to the maximum allowed by the apparatus; 3” is typical, while 72” is feasible; lengths up to 72” are often realized through Butt welding of shorter segments.

Dimensional Accuracy – ± 5% in diameter.


Beveled peripheries can be integrated into Powder Metallurgy components, typically without incurring additional costs. This design element facilitates smoother assembly in press-fit procedures and fortifies the rim of components formed by pressing, a crucial aspect in high-porosity, coarse-grained parts. Beveling is possible on both the upper and lower edges for pressed parts; however, for gravity-sintered components, beveling is feasible on a single edge only.

Articulating Parameters for P/M Porous Media Fabrication

In the realm of P/M porous media fabrication, the ensuing data proves pivotal for the artisan:

  • The intended utilization of the component (be it for sifting, fluidizing, aerating liquids, dampening sound, or extracting oils or other liquids from gases, etc.)
  • The nature of substances traversing the component.
  • The potential for corrosive challenges.
  • Any extraordinary operational conditions, encompass aspects like temperature or pressure.
  • The types of impurities that may arise.
  • The requisites in terms of dimensions, form, and precision.
  • The quantity of units in demand.
  • The methodology for installation or support.
  • The optimal flow velocity and the tolerable pressure reduction across the filter unit; the pressure within the system.

It is advantageous for the producer if the designer refrains from dictating irrelevant parameters.

The significance of a symbiotic relationship between the client and the supplier for additional specification details cannot be overstated.

Secondary Operations


Press Fitting and Sinterbonding 

The techniques of Press Fitting and Sinterbonding stand out for their efficacy. These methods enable the fusion of machined components with porous Powder Metallurgy (P/M) counterparts, sharing a similar elemental makeup. The process of Sinterbonding integrates a press fit assembly either during the inaugural sintering phase or amidst a subsequent thermal processing cycle.

The pliability of porous materials lends itself well to Press Fitting, allowing for facile deformation. This approach facilitates the creation of robust metallurgical connections, achieved through the formation of diffusion bonds at the junctures where the porous substrate and the machined elements meet.

The construction of these assemblies can be executed by positioning a machined part within a gravity sintering mold or within a bespoke compaction apparatus, followed by the introduction of the powder before the sintering process commences.

An alternative pathway involves the insertion of sintered porous components into the machined hardware, typically adhering to an interference fit ranging from 1 to 3 percent, contingent on the dimensions and material of the part. Subsequent sintering solidifies the metallurgical linkage.


In the realm of Powder Metallurgy (P/M), the zenith of uniformity in porous components is attained post-sintering. Consequently, it is paramount to engineer P/M tooling in such a manner that post-sintering finishing of the porous element’s functional surfaces is rendered unnecessary.

Although certain methodologies exist for the machining of porous segments whilst preserving their porosity, the majority of such procedures are inclined to occlude the pores. In instances where machining or abrading is imperative for attaining the requisite contour, dimensions, or surface texture, the utilization of exceedingly keen tooling equipped with a minimally negative rake is advised.

Post-machining, the area of operation necessitates treatment to eliminate cutting fluids and to chemically expose the obscured pores. This is followed by meticulous cleansing to eradicate all traces of the etchant, a task best delegated to the supplier.

Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) and laser excision present alternative stratagems to traditional machining for the fabrication of unique geometries. Unlike conventional machining and laser excision, which typically necessitate acid etching to purge smeared surface metal and to reinvigorate the pores, adept EDM processing can maintain pore openness, thereby necessitating only comprehensive cleaning.

EDM processing is generally earmarked for prototype elements owing to its elevated processing and associated purification expenses. Conversely, laser excision and machining can be cost-effective for mass production, provided the surface porosity does not demand reactivation.

For porous metallic components, machining of areas not involved in work is preferably executed sans coolant, and the components designated for machining should be manipulated with uncontaminated hands on an impeccably cleaned apparatus devoid of residual oil. It is more advantageous to integrate a machined element through sinter-bonding, welding, or adhesive bonding.

Welding, Brazing, and Soldering


Assembling porous stainless steel edifices can be adeptly achieved through the fusion of one porous component with another or with a precision-engineered counterpart. Utilization of inert arc welding is paramount in this process.

Should the welder lack familiarity with these specific materials, it is advisable to provide them with prototype components for preliminary welding trials. For insights into the design of interlocking components, consultation with the component purveyors is beneficial. Ordinarily, these suppliers are equipped to furnish the complete welded construct.

The application of soldering, whether it be robust or malleable, and the process of brazing are generally discouraged in the context of porous P/M structures. This is due to the propensity of the porous matrix to absorb both flux and solder through capillary action.

Nonetheless, certain specialized brazing substances and thermal procedures have been innovated to arrest the braze material’s flow within the joint locale, thereby establishing a robust bond. Predominantly, TIG welding or alternative methods involving diminished heat input, such as laser welding or Electron Beam Welding, are advocated. These techniques ensure both the mechanical integrity and the effective sealing of the joint.

Epoxy Bonding

Epoxy amalgamation emerges as an alternative technique for adhesion in a spectrum of specialized scenarios. Utilizing epoxy of a denser consistency proves advantageous, as it resists the propensity to seep from the bonding region before solidification, a common shortfall in adhesives of lesser viscosity. The advent of epoxies that withstand elevated temperatures and exhibit enhanced resistance to corrosive elements has extended their functional longevity in environments of moderated extremity.


Numerous permeable P/M components are fabricated at such a nominal cost that their disposal post-utilization is economically feasible. Conversely, pricier elements and conglomerations may undergo decontamination through solvent immersion, reverse purging, or incineration of impurities. The choice of cleansing methodology hinges on the type of detritus to be extricated from and harbored within the P/M component, as well as the foundational substance of the filter.

Storage and Handling

Vigilant preservation is paramount for porous P/M components. Optimal conservation involves retaining these elements in their initial transit encasements within a moderately arid environment. For sectors demanding meticulous purity, such as the medical, semiconductor, telecommunication, and analytical instrumentation fields, employing specialized uncontaminated handling techniques is advisable.

These include “Organic Free” methodologies, “Clean Room” standards, and “High Purity, Particle Free” encapsulation. Additionally, these porous components may undergo a purification process to ensure their secure utilization in oxygen service applications.

Insert Molding


Spongy metallic elements stand as prime candidates for amalgamation via insert molding with a variety of thermoplastics and sophisticated synthetic resins. The plastic substance has the propensity to permeate into the marginal porosity, thereby establishing a robust seal and a mechanically cohesive juncture between the spongy component and the plastic injection molded constituent.

Contact Saifilter


Saifilter has been working with clients for many years to develop engineering and design innovations that turn their product ideas into reality.

Our collaboration can begin early in the product design process and address existing product issues.

Regardless of any issues you have during the product development process, our engineers are always available to answer your questions as they research possible solutions.

Simply send us your information to [email protected] and one of our product development engineers will contact you within 48 hours.


Read More

Scroll to Top